Ein herrliches Zitat aus dem Jahr 2010 (Link):
“Griechenland kann bei der Sanierung seiner Staatsfinanzen offenbar nicht mit deutschen Steuergeldern rechnen. “Ein ganz klares Nein: Es gibt keine Haushaltsmittel für die Griechen“, sagte die stellvertretende Regierungssprecherin Sabine Heimbach. Sie trat damit Spekulationen entgegen, wonach in der Bundesregierung wegen der Euro-Stabilität über deutsche Hilfsgelder für Athen nachgedacht werde.”
Tja. Unglaublich, wie dreist die Öffentlichkeit belogen wurde. Und heute haben wir den ESM…Und demnächst das dritte Steuerzahlerpaket für Griechenland. Und die Lügen gehen immer weiter, immer weiter…
Und klar: Es steckt da gar keine Absicht dahinter (Ironie).
Info & Kontakt: Kontakt@aktionsbuendnis-direkte-demokratie.de.
Kommentare zu: "“Es gibt keine Haushaltsmittel für die Griechen”" (9)
Liebe Mitdenker,
die Regierung Merkel hat in den letzten zwei Jahren faktisch nichts getan, um den Euro zu retten oder das Euroland, weltweit, oder gegen den US$ strategisch zu stärken. Ganz im Gegenteil hat sie keine Gelegenheit ausgelassen unsere/die Position zu schwächen. All diese Lügen sprechen ein eindeutiges Bild, sodaß sich mancher fragte, was will Merkel eigentlich und von was/wem wird sie getrieben!?
Wenn man sich folgenden link in Ruhe zu Gemüte führt, kommt man auf die übergeordnete Lage und die Motivationen, immer von der Überlegung ausgehend: Wem nutzt das alles!? Es wird deutlich, daß der Euro dem US$ im Wege steht bei dem Versuch die finanzielle Hegemonie beizubehalten.
Keine Verschwörungstheorie, sondern knallharte Interessenspolitik des Imperators, USA!(Leider nur in englisch!)
http://www.crisishq.com/why-prepare/world-war-3-preserving-petrodollar/
Dazu eine schöne “Persiflage”:
Diane Feinstein is clueless. She is the Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and is one of the best informed politicians in the world. Yet she asks: “How could the Muslims do this to us? In Egypt we threw out Mubarak and installed the Muslim Brotherhood. In Libya we ensured the death of Kaddafi when we enforced a no-fly zone so the rebels would not be bombed. We helped you gain free elections….we give you millions in foreign aid. What went wrong? Why are you attacking our embassy? Why did you kill our ambassador?” Through the US Liberals everywhere are asking the same questions.
Here is your answer Diane: The Muslims attacked on 9-11 because they want to make sure that Romney wins the election. Why do they want Romney to win, because they know he will drop more bombs.
This is what the Muslims want and it is the same thing that Israel wants…they want war. No matter what Israel puts out for public consumption, they do not want peace. Why? Well it is all about money. For example, the Israeli budget is made up of one third internal revenue, one third US aid, and one third donations by US Jews. Now with the slow economy and the Bernie Madoff scandal, their contributions are way down.
There is only one thing that will get donations up, and it is war.
It is the same with Muslims. The war on terror has been going for 10 years now, and frankly people are getting tired of it. It is harder and harder to get recruits because, as US intelligence gets better, more and more of them are dying. No matter what the say about heaven, the young do not want to die. They are losing there fervor because all their friends are dead. At the same time, Muslim donators are getting tied of the bloodshed and are wondering just what is being accomplished.
Remember the violence in North Ireland many years ago. One woman who ran a B&B on the shores of Loch Ness told me, “This is our Vietnam.” After many years of bombs and bloodshed the rebels finally gave up and Northern Ireland did not re-join Ireland. Rebels got tired of dying, of struggling, and seeing the dead pile up. Basically they just gave up when their contributions dried up. The lesson here is that rebels can only keep a emotional high for so long, and can only keep fighting as long as donations pour in.
The point is that Obama cannot run on his domestic record which is a total disaster. The only thing that he can claim any credit for is his foreign policy, which basically boils down to the killing of Osama Bin Laden. So the rebels want Romney to win because he will send in the troops, bomb, and kill and that will rile everyone up again.
EGYPT AND LIBYA
The Libs claim that it was a video that caused all these attacks.
What the Libs can’t get themselves to admit is that maybe it wasn’t the video. Maybe it was Spiking the Ball about the Bin Laden murder that upset the little darlings. 21 times during the Lib convention speakers bragged about killing Bin Laden. To show he has some balls, which no body believes, Obama claims that he is in charge of the Kill List of enemies to be taken out by the drones. The only Obama bumper sticker I have seen recently says this: “General Motors Alive…Bin Laden Dead.” So they are proud of killing Bin Laden. But the Muslims are not happy with it. Perhaps that is why many of them, as they jumped the walls of the American embassy, were screaming “We’re all Osamas, Obama.”
THE BIG LIE
Now Obama claims that it was some obscure movie that caused the attacks. This claim is getting more lame day by day, but the Libs are sticking with it. This is the current Lib plan…no matter what the question, the answer is always the same. Everything is the Republican’s fault….either George Bush, or Romney or some right wing movie maker. If you ask a Lib what time is… he will say it’s the Republican’s fault.
So the Lib’s strategy is the Big Lie. Here is another Big Lie: that Islam is the religion of peace. Isn’t it funny that it is the Libs, who claim to be open-minded and tolerant, who are the most closed-minded. And it turns out that conservatives, famous for their strict values, are the open minded ones. They can see both sides of an issue and are open to change. As a matter of fact you could say that Libs are blood brothers of the radical Muslims in that they are completely intolerant of any other point of view. Among the Muslims they consider it their duty to kill people who don’t believe as they do, and the Libs only wish they could do the same.
CLINTON
Am I the only one who picked up on this? Clinton wants Romney to win, and that is why he wore a Red tie at the convention. Red is the color of Republicans, Blue the color of the Libs. Why does Clinton want Romney to win? Because he knows that any Lib, especially Hillary, would have no chance of winning after 8 years of Obama.
Clinton knows that his wife will have a good chance against Romney in 4 years. Why is that? Well, what does Romney have to look forward to when he takes office in January. The first problem will be the “fiscal cliff” of massive new taxes and the expiration of the Bush tax cuts. These events take place on Jan 1st will take billions out of the economy and worsen the recession. Nevertheless, Romney will make an attempt to get the deficit under control through cuts in spending. Now the people who elected him say they want “fiscal responsibility.” In reality, they will turn on Romney when he actually begins to fulfill this mandate. People say they want a responsible government until their entitlements are cut and taxes are raised. Then they will turn on Romney and he will get killed in the mid term elections. So Hillary will have a good chance in 4 years.
But of course Hillary has no chance of being elected President. She is completely un-electable because she has high “negatives.” That is a nice way of saying that she is the most hated woman in the world. Remember, just as no one would ever want their son to grow up to be Bill Clinton, few would want their daughter to grow up to be Hillary Clinton.
Remember Billy Goat at the convention, wagging that bony finger at us and saying vote for Obama. It reminds me of the time, many years ago, when Clinton waved that bony finger and said “I did not have sex with that woman….Miss Lewinsky.” It was a Big Lie at the time and everyone knew it was a lie. Yet Clinton stood before the American people for 9 months and claimed it was the truth.
I had to laugh when the Libs had to go against every moral sentiment they had to back Clinton. They had to bend over backward to support Clinton, which was only possible because they are so spineless. They would never allow their own children to lie like Clinton, or want them to become a moral reprobate like he was. Yet they were happy to look their friends, family, neighbors and co-workers in the face and say “Oh, Clinton is telling the truth. He never got blow jobs from Monica.”
Why people so love Clinton is beyond me….it just proves how many people can be snowed by this consummate con-man. But when Clinton dies, and the glow of his personality fades, the permanent record will show that he was one of two presidents who were impeached, and he was the only president who was ever convicted of a felony while in office.
Here is another Big Lie. “Are you better off than you were 4 years ago?” Everyone knows the answer is NO, but the Libs say that is not true. They have nothing else they can say, so their plan is to just deny the obvious.
Of course the Libs are happy with the Big Lie that Obama will win. They sustain this with the Big Lie polls that come out every day showing the race is close. That is because, at this point in the game, that is all they have to sustain them through the campaign. They live in the illusion that Obama might pull it out. But that is tough when everything seems to be going against the Libs and all the enthusiasm has gone out of their campaign. The next 60 days are going to be a very depressing time for the Libs. The election will put them out of their misery. Obama is Jimmy Carter 2. And just like Jimmy Carter he will lose in a landslide.
But the trouble is that when you live by the Big Lie, you die by the big lie.
What that means is that when Libs make statements that are obviously not true you lose all credibility. Eventually supporters finally say “Come on, of course I am in the tank for you, but now you are insulting my intelligence. I will be voting for you guys, but please stop putting out all these ridiculous falsehoods. It is embarrassing when I am at work and Republican workers give me a hard time about it.” That is why at work the Libs are hiding under their desk. They are still 100% loyal to their party, but they have to endure a lot of grief for it.
Eine Lüge ist erst dann eine Lüge, wenn der Betroffene danach frägt und anschließende absichtlich die Unwahrheit als Antwort erhält. Da aber gut 80% der Bevölkerung erst gar nicht erst danach gefragt hat, ist
ups! .. sie auch nicht belogen worden. Man hat lediglich dafür gesorgt, dass sie immer das zu hören bekommen haben, was sie auch hören wollten. So funktioniert der Markt, die Politik und unsere gesamte Gesellschaft. Die Wahrheit interessiert kaum jeamnden, sondern nur das, was interessant ist. Und Lügen sind viel interessanter als die Wahrheit. Also kann hier oder auch sonst wo stehen was will, erst wenn wir wieder eine Judicative haben, die der Wahrheit wieder zu einer Stimme verhilft, wird sich das auch ändern. Aber genau die ist mit dem ESM abgeschafft worden, zuerst indem sie ihre Arbeit einfach nicht gemacht hat (BVG), dann indem die Immunität festgeschrieben wurde und damit auch die theoretische Möglichkeit einer Haftung ausgeschlossen wurde.
Niemand hat die Absicht eine Mauer zu bauen!
Zu Kim Peter:
bin leider des englischen nicht mächtig, aber ich denke, wer hinter dem Ganzen steckt:
Bilderberger, Goldman Sachs und die NWO (Neue Weltordnung). Es gibt auch genug deutsche Politiker, die schon zu solchen Treffen eingeladen wurden. Im Netz ist alles zu finden.
Leider läßt sich das 2. Link nicht öffnen! MfG V. Zander
War ein Fehler. Sorry.
Hier ein Spruch, den ich eben in der FAZ gelesen habe:
“Politiker belügen Journalisten und glauben dann das, was am nächsten Tage in der Zeitung steht.” (von einem mir unbekannten Verfasser)
der trifft doch voll zu
Genau, und wer dann sagt, “Das stimmt doch aber nicht!”, der ist dann politisch inkorrekt, hahahaha.